RE: SportsTalkSocial: Proposal to implement deep changes
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
NO
Upvote here to STOP the proposal, any % upvote will trigger 100% GP support.
All rewards from this comment go to the governance fund
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Upvote here to STOP the proposal, any % upvote will trigger 100% GP support.
All rewards from this comment go to the governance fund
I think, rather, that ALL sports communities should merge.
That would give us more strength for the future.
The language barrier would perhaps be a drawback, but it would be surmountable.
I spoke with the leader of the SWC community and he has the same thought as myself.
The issue is that it would take longer to implement a whole sports project.
I vote NO as a way of getting my ideas across, never because I disagree with coming up with a solution for the SPORTS token.
That being the case, I leave the merger proposal on the table....
Thank you in advance for your attention.
Best regards.
c.c. @manuelramos, @eddiespino, @theycallmedan
Greetings to all, I think that uniting all the sports communities in one place sounds like a great idea, but I do not see it feasible, because SWC has a mission and objective already set, Full Deportes has a long way to go, I think we should be careful about the actions we take on behalf of the community we represent.
The idea sounds good, but I don't see it as feasible, scalable or decentralised.
Yep. NO in this case will mean most likely eventually nothing getting done. Aka, no way to go ahead and try new things. There is always some risk in going on ahead and trying new things, but in small steps, things can shape and become better eventually. Just takes time and continuous effort.
As @forykw in the future a lot of things can be done but for that it is necessary to have persons taking care of community and using there time to improve things.
Currently, this is not happening and this proposal is to change the current community status.
You are free to vote what you think that is better but voting NO only will make the community continue as it is without impprovements or changes.