avatar
"People have only as much liberty as they have the intelligence to want and the courage to take." - Emma Goldman
SPORTS Power
0
Vote Value
0
avatar
Dead account - follow @matt-archy
SPORTS Power
0
Vote Value
0
avatar
Hive's #1 Censorship Resistant Video Platform
SPORTS Power
42711.216
Vote Value
4.490
avatar
|| Oregonian || 30y/o || Rollerblading || Laissez Faire || Libertarian || Free-Market Capitalist ||
SPORTS Power
8176.678
Vote Value
0.860
SPORTS Power
0
Vote Value
0
SPORTS Power
225.595
Vote Value
0.024
SPORTS Power
0
Vote Value
0
avatar
Building a Culture of Consequence
SPORTS Power
0
Vote Value
0
SPORTS Power
0
Vote Value
0
avatar
Hive badge with all the accounts listed in the News page
SPORTS Power
0
Vote Value
0
avatar
This Is My Journey - My Content Is Not Financial Advice. Co-Founder @ThreeSpeak - Upvotes/Reblogs are not endorsements.
SPORTS Power
136.306
Vote Value
0.014
avatar
The Path to Enlightenment | Link in Bio
SPORTS Power
0
Vote Value
0
avatar
Libertarianism is based on the "Non-Aggression Principle" (the NAP), which means that you have the liberty to do whatever you want, so long as you don't initiate force or fraud against another individual, or their property. Non-aggression is not to be confused with pacifism. So long as you don't initiate force, you have the natural right to violence in self-defense. Just not to initiate aggression against another individual. Disproportionate violence in "self-defense" is obviously also a type of aggression (an initiation of force), so chopping someone's feet off for accidentally stepping on your shoe is obviously not a right. Libertarianism doesn't care if you choose to form a workers' co-op (à la Pierre-Joseph Proudhon), a communist commune (à la Kropotkin), or otherwise enter into any voluntary arrangement or contract -- such as *free trade commerce* (à la Ludwig von Mises), loans, employment, etc -- so long as any of these arrangements are voluntary. Specifically, libertarianism doesn't give any exception to the 'NAP'. Not to gangs calling themselves "government". Nor, to "democracy," or some mythical "social contract," or any other type of so-called "greater good." The Individual -- and individual liberty -- is not a means to any end; Consent is the means, and the end, to any legitimate social endeavor.
SPORTS Power
0
Vote Value
0
SPORTS Power
0
Vote Value
0
avatar
Co-creator of @peakd long time professional Photographer
SPORTS Power
5.938
Vote Value
0.001
SPORTS Power
0
Vote Value
0