PeakD
How to win in Court Without a Fight - Clerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court Scam 😑
tonybad58
7 mins ago
C/Actifit
1 min read
170 words
Listen to post
Ai

Sandra Joseph retired owner of the famous restaurant GREEN LEAF, the favourite hangout of many of the great and the good in politics and media, gets assistance from www.scambuster.tv , to win her case in court. But there's a twist in the story, as the drama unfolds.
Barriers are put up against members of the public, as criminal gangs take control of our courts, to steal assets and abuse children, on an unprecedented scale.
@ the Clerkenwell & Shoreditch Court in London, Judge XXX Sterlini, alleged Court Manager Mrs Vasue (Mr Mumford is the real Manager?), and the police, all get in the way of what ought to be a straight forward win for the victim of Court Fraud, multiple times.

Sign and share the petition against Court Order Scams, used to steal Homes, Savings, Businesses, Children and Cars HSBCC www.ScamBuster.TV - Contribute to the fight.
More to come.

This report was published via Actifit app (Android | iOS). Check out the original version here on actifit.io

08/02/2025

7632

Plogging

#actifit
#Justice
#Privacy
#Wealth
#Crime
#fight4justice
#anthonybadaloo

#Freedom
#Cryptofi
#leyf
#scambusterTV
#sportstalk
#movetoearn
#move2earn
#hive-193552
1
0
0
0.03

No comments on this post yet.
Ai Prompt
Design a debate format based on this post, providing arguments for and against the main points, to encourage critical thinking among readers.

Ai
Debate Format:

Topic: The Clerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court scam and the use of Court Order Scams to steal assets and abuse children.

Opening Statements:

• For the motion: The Clerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court scam is a dangerous phenomenon that allows criminal gangs to take control of the courts, steal assets, and abuse children. This needs to be stopped immediately to protect the public and ensure justice is served.
• Against the motion: There may be misunderstandings or misrepresentations in the allegations made against the court and its officials. It is important to investigate thoroughly before jumping to conclusions and taking action.

Arguments For:

1. The case of Sandra Joseph and the obstacles she faced in court demonstrate the presence of criminal gangs manipulating the legal system for their own gain.
2. The involvement of Judge XXX Sterlini, alleged Court Manager Mrs. Vasue, and the police in obstructing justice raises serious concerns about corruption within the court system.
3. The use of Court Order Scams to steal homes, savings, businesses, children, and cars is a blatant abuse of power that must be addressed through legal and investigative measures.
4. Supporting the petition against Court Order Scams and contributing to the fight is essential to raise awareness and protect vulnerable individuals from falling victim to such scams.

Arguments Against:

1. The allegations made in the post may be unsubstantiated or exaggerated, requiring a thorough investigation to verify their validity.
2. It is important to consider the perspective of the court officials mentioned, such as Judge XXX Sterlini and alleged Court Manager Mrs. Vasue, before making assumptions about their involvement in criminal activities.
3. Without concrete evidence and reliable sources, it is premature to conclude that there is a widespread issue of criminal gangs controlling the courts and orchestrating scams.
4. While it is crucial to address any instances of corruption or misconduct within the legal system, it is equally important to approach the situation with caution and ensure due process is followed.

Closing Statements:

• For the motion: The evidence presented in the post highlights a disturbing trend of corruption and abuse of power within the court system that must be addressed promptly and decisively.
• Against the motion: While the allegations are concerning, it is essential to gather all the facts and conduct a thorough investigation to determine the veracity of the claims before taking any definitive action.

Privacy Settings

Congrats on providing Proof of Activity via your Actifit report!

You have been rewarded 103.15 AFIT tokens for your effort in reaching 7632 activity, as well as your user rank and report quality!
You also received a 1.03% upvote via @actifit account.

Rewards Details

Rank Bag - L1

+ 10 % User Rank

Double Raindeer - L1

+ 100 % AFIT

Sports Hat - L1

+ 15 % AFIT

Water Bottle - L1

+ 5 AFIT

Running Shoes - L1

+ 10 AFIT

Sports Chimney - L1

+ 50 % SPORTS

Sports Drink - L1

+ 3 % SPORTS

AFIT rewards and upvotes are based on your: - User rank: which depends on your delegated HP, accumulated AFIT tokens, rewarded post count, recent rewarded activity and owned AFITX. - Post score: which depends on your activity count, post content, post upvotes, quality comments, moderator review and user rank.

To improve your user rank, delegate more, pile up more AFIT and AFITX tokens, and post more.
To improve your post score, get to the max activity count, work on improving your post content, improve your user rank, engage with the community to get more upvotes and quality comments.

Chat with us on discord | Visit our website
Follow us on Twitter | Join us on Telegram
Download on playstore | Download on app store

Knowledge base:
FAQs | Whitepaper
How to signup | Maximize your rewards
Complete Actifit Tutorial

Support our efforts below by voting for:

• our witness @actifit on Hive via actifit profile, peakd, or hive blog.
• our witness @actifit-he on Hive-engine, via Tribaldex.