Aljamain Sterling claims he is one of the most dominant fighters in the division... STFU

Aljamain Sterling is one of the most boring fighters to ever set foot in the modern-day octagon. He is booed at nearly every fight he is involved in and the crowds erupt into near chaotic applause whenever he gets defeated or even momentarily bested. He is a grappler and that is about it. It would be unfair to suggest that his grappling isn't effective, because it certainly is, but to go back to a reference in the film "Gladiator" .... the people simply are not entertained by this and because of this, people moan and groan whenever his name is on a fight card.

They know that more often than not they are going to be in for 15 minutes of hugging and playing defense, all the while never really generating any sort of offense.


image.png
src

Getting your opponent to the ground is a very important part of UFC and MMA in a general sense. However, if you want people to actually enjoy your fights you need to actually do something with it once you are there. For exciting ground and pound fighters, they will take risks by posturing and moving their own bodies in order to attempt to get a better position where it is actually possible to inflict damage or force a submission. Sterling just locks up the body triangle and puts in just enough work so that the ref cannot justifiably stand them back up. It is extremely rare that he actually does any damage to an opponent but rather, just makes so that they are incapable of doing any damage to him while he wins because of ground control time on the scorecards.

I am not a fan of points being awarded for ground control time.

I would love to see an adjustment in the rules where ground control time is not a factor in who is determined the winner when the person who has the other on the ground fails to actually do anything while they are there. With many fighters, we are excited when they take their opponent to the ground but with Sterling, the crowd will normally have a collective groan as soon as Sterling, yet again, remains standing to kickbox for as little amount of time as possible and then once again locks up his opponent in a body triangle for the next 4 and a half minutes.


src

He does this time and time again. To the inexperienced, the above picture probably looks like Petr Yan is in trouble because Sterling has his back and has him locked in with a body triangle as well as an arm around his neck. However, Yan is trained in defending against exactly this sort of thing and provided he doesn't expose his neck - which he didn't - Sterling can't really do anything in this position other than throw some weak forearms or hammer punches at him.

Sterling almost certainly knows this and recently he finally did an interview about his performance at UFC 300, where he did win but in a fight that had the crowd booing so loud that the UFC had to change how they were doing the audio feed for the home audience. Sterling was unapologetic about his performance, and well, I think he should be. The idea behind a prize fight isn't to just win, but to provide some amount of entertainment for the people that paid hundreds of dollars to be there.

Sterling said that he had perhaps "the most dominant match of the night" and that just makes me upset and very much looking forward to whoever KO's this guy in the future. He pointed out that he shut down Calvin Kattar's striking game and well, yes he did do that.... by spending more than 10 of the 15 minutes on the ground while not striking at all himself either. He points at the fact that Kattar only had 19 strikes the entire fight as some sort of good thing and I suppose that would be a good thing if this was a grappling tournament - it isn't. It is very difficult to land anything on a guy that is focusing not on causing any damage to you, but merely shutting down your ability to do it to him.

Sterling went on to say this about Kattar

"So for me to use my skill set against his and to reduce him from being someone who’s that dangerous to literally no threat whatsoever. I think it deserves a little bit of credit in that regard.”

Once again, this is MMA, not a contest to see who can prevent the other guy from punching the most and the fact that Aljamain did almost no damage to Kattar either and merely spent nearly the entire fight either running away or locked in a triangle on the ground, doesn't add any credibility to his case for claiming he deserves credit.

Sean O'Malley took the belt from Sterling in the bantamweight division and claimed that he "saved the division from obscurity by getting Sterling out of the picture." I definitely agree with this because if any division has a boring champion, nobody is going to be interested in their events. Dana White and the rest of the top brass are very aware of this and Sterling is very unlikely to be the focus of any PPV event unless it is a title match..... and all the people in attendance that are not related to Sterling by blood will be rooting against him.

He is the most boring fighter in all MMA right now and his paychecks are reflected in that. This will not change unless he changes his tactics.



0
0
0.000
11 comments
avatar

Blame his opponents for not having the necessary skills to knock him out and you cannot blame him because he is winning.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Exactly, this is MMA, not wrestling, not boxing - use whatever works or go to kickboxing and stop whining about getting taken down.

Guess what? if they train wrestling more they will be able to stop the takedown and/or get back up - but at what cost? stand up training. But they are so worried that they need to be able to KO him that they don't train wrestling and then get taken down and controlled and are surprised about it. LOL

Time to move camps then boys, stop making excuses and get in the wrestling room

0
0
0.000
avatar

Sean IS the case in point - stand up was good enough and he worked on takedown defense and was able to keep it standing long enough to catch him -because Sean is that much better than the other fighters Sterling has beat. Sean would kick Petr's ass

0
0
0.000
avatar

Sean would kick Petr's ass

I hope Petr can return to form because I would like to see this matchup. He hasn't really been himself lately and eeked out a win recently.

0
0
0.000
avatar

That's so true, people are putting Petr off but he lost to some amazing fighters and definitely has a chance to make another run for the title.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I acknowledge that he is skilled, but if you watched an entire fight of his you would see that his tactics are exceptionally boring.

0
0
0.000
avatar

okay, defeintly don't agree with this take.

However let me lay the groundwork...Sean was RIGHT that he saved Bantamweight by winning the belt, but to me that in no way takes away from Sterling's wins before that.

We can talk all we want about 'prize fighting' having to be exciting - but this isn't boxing son - you even said

"Once again, this is MMA, not a contest to see who can prevent the other guy from punching the most..." - Actually, IMO - this is EXACTLY what MMA is. STand up only sports aren't real fighting, real fighting means you can get wrestled up by a dude who doesn't let you punch them and so you CAN'T win the fight.

This isn't about what is fun to watch, but just like going back to the OG days of the UFC, its about who can win the fight and I'm sorry but if I get taken down and controlled for 15 minutes I don't care if the other guy did NOTHING else, he is better than me because he stopped me from doing what I wanted to do to win.

As a grappler myself, I know it is boring to watch for most people, but him having his opponents back for the whole round is PETR's problem, he needs to get the fuck up and punch Sterling in the head - and he wanted to - and he COULDN'T

Again, not the most exciting, but I am not here for head trauma, I'm here for the strategic matchups and the dynamic martial arts being used.

0
0
0.000
avatar

wonderful reply and thank you. It's nice to get the perspective of someone that also actually participates in the sport and has inside knowledge. While I will acknowledge the fact that Sterling's tactics are obviously effective, it just isn't entertaining. I loved Johny Hendricks but he started using the tactic of taking down his opponent and depending on "control time" to win matches. Even though I liked the guy this was boring to watch.

You are correct though, this is a path to victory and if the opponent wants to one up him, they need to be good enough to prevent this ground game from happening in the first place, or be able to reverse it once they do end up on the ground. If Sterling wants the crowd to like him, he doesn't have to stay standing up, this would be stupid since his entire strategy revolves around being on the ground. I guess it would be nice to see him actually take risks once he is on the ground and shoot for some damage every now and then.

This isn't about what is fun to watch, but just like going back to the OG days of the UFC

haha, I remember the Gracie matches where he would be on his back just heel kicking Shamrock for a very long time. Shamrock was much larger and stronger but simply couldn't get out of this position.

It works, but it isn't entertaining. I'm not disagreeing with you and his tactics are effective but I would imagine that Dana really loathes having a match with him because the fans tune in for entertainment.

0
0
0.000
avatar

ooh also I should say, this is all in good fun - LOVE THE POST \m/

0
0
0.000
avatar

i never take offense at someone disagreeing with me pal, especially if they are as informed as you are. It would be very boring if we were all groupthink zombies :)

0
0
0.000