RE: What Do You Think About SPORTS Engagement Project?

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

@amr008.sports is a bot, I can imagine that one bot will spam/comment and another bot (amr008.sports) will upvote it and spam with another comment. This is not engagement! This is what I want to downvote.
Go !ENGAGE, it's much better and anyone with 1001 ENGAGE tokens can use it

sportstalk
0
0
0.000
5 comments
avatar

Congrats, you were upvoted from this account because you were in Top 25 engagers yesterday on Sportstalksocial .
You made a total of 1 comments and talked to 1 different authors .
Your rank is 23 .
For more details about this project please read here - link to announcement post
You can also delegate and get weekly payouts.

I am running a Hive giveaway contest too , to win it - you have to be in Top 20 in CTP + LEO + SPORTS + Top 5 in STEM

Today's winner of 1 HIVE is - jfang003 ,amr008 and anderssinho

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Spammers can try to take advantage of this. As far as I know, @amr008 has some setup to deal with that. If it does not work as per expectation, people in the SportsTalk community will take steps about that. Thank you @mk-sports-token for your concerns and for sharing this. I appreciate your feedback! That is what makes our community stronger.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I understand your concern @mk-sports-token but you have got it wrong .

I wish you would have looked at the announcement of the project or how the project works before you took your decision but I am okay with your action of not voting YES for the proposal .

  1. Yes @amr008.sports is a bot . All the rewards it gets ( if it gets ) will completely go to engagement project and I won't take any cut .
  2. You are wrong when you say it upvoted other bots comments because that can never happen .

How ?

All the comments made by bots are via beem API or some other API which is considered as "BEEM" app/frontend . So the comments are automatically excluded because they are not made from the sportstalksocial frontend.

In other words

Only those comments which are made from sportstalksocial frontend is taken into count . The bots cannot make comments from sportstalksocial frontend because they use API to interact with blockchain and when API is used , the frontend is different .

I am okay with you not voting for the proposal but I guess there is a misunderstanding of how the project works . The project tries to build traffic to the site , you can check all the upvoted from @amr008.sports and you won't be able to find any upvotes for bots .

You can check all the comments upvoted from @amr008.sports , it will be made from sportstalksocial frontend itself.

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Ok. Let's make a deal. I'll change my vote if you are willing to make some changes to the code

  • Implement blacklist and add my account there
  • add option - do not leave a comment under my comment, so user's comment will be upvoted but bot won't leave a comment
  • max 1 upvotes per 24 hr
0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

  1. I have already implemented a blacklist . I add users who abuse the system , so far nobody is abusing so there are no users. I will add you to blacklist if you wish .

  2. I have already considered shifting from replying through bot to posting via dbuzz or other frontends from tomorrow.

  3. That I cannot do , I have already explained why I cannot do that here - https://leofinance.io/@amr008/engagement-project-14th-februrary-top-engagers-get-curated-for-enaging-with-others-first-day-curation-stats

0
0
0.000
Reply