Shut Up, Rodrigo!
"There are more than a hundred ways to win a football match. Choose whichever works for you!"
Recently, I read with disgust a news highlight on one of the dailies that Manchester City's Rodri was highly critical of Morocco's counterattacking approach against Spain. Immediately I saw that, I wished I was in close proximity to the Spaniard to give him a piece of my mind. But, I'll gladly give that piece of my mind right here, right now.
Seriously, what's the bias with possession football? Yes, you have to kick the ball around to somehow win a football match. In a similar manner, you have to score to win a football match. A coach I worked with back then once reminded me that a football match starts at 0-0. If neither team scores the game ends as a goalless draw. Even on the rare occasions when it goes to a penalty shootout, you still have to stick the ball in the back of the net to win, this time facing only the goalkeeper from 12 yards.
So, whatever pattern of play a team chooses to engage in always starts and ends with putting the ball in the back of the net. Afterall, goals are what make football a lively and joyous sport. I've never seen a situation where a defender makes a strong tackle and every one of his teammates leaves the football field to go celebrate that tackle with the manager. The only action that commands such grand celebration is goalscoring. So, why would a dude who plays for a team that could neither stick the ball into the net from open play in over 120 minutes or beat just the goalkeeper from 12 yards in three attempts have the effrontery to send insults the way of another team?
I've never been the type that criticize tactical plans of other managers, it looks stupid to me. A serious team plays to his strength while also considering the opposition. Mourinho's Inter Milan played without the ball at Camp Nou back in 2010 and got the desired result. His swashbuckling, counter attacking style was good enough to knock out prime Barcelona and defeat Van Gaal's Bayern to the Champions League title. Ranieri's Leicester had less than 40% possession in most games they played in their title winning season. I bet most people didn't remember that now, but they remember Leicester City defied the odds to win the English Premier League. If every team decides to pass the ball to death all in the name of playing possession based football, most games will be joyless, goalless.
Against Morocco, Spain had just one shot on target in 120 minutes. They were utterly clueless until Nico Williams came in and started running at the defenders with the ball, jettisoning the possession game for a more direct approach. The deeply defending Morocco had at least two chances to win the game within 90 minutes, one a clear goalscoring opportunity. What's the point of having over 1000 passes and a million more touches and you can't shoot the ball on target at least two times?
Guardiola has been uber successful with possession based football. That's not because possession based football is the best way to win a football match, it's simply because Guardiola is a once in a lifetime managerial talent. He's more like the Messi of managers; where he has succeeded other managers have failed woefully. Klopp focused on gegenpressing and he's defeated Guardiola on several occasions with his heavy metal style of play. There are more than one route to score a goal. Find the one that suits you and your players, then stick to it.
Xabi Alonso played for Benitez, Mourinho and Guardiola. He once explained that while playing at Madrid (for Mourinho), they control the opponents without having the ball. In the end, an ugly win is way better than a beautiful defeat. What's an ugly win anyway? Not having the ball for most of 90 minutes? Or, defending your goal and then nicking just one goal that is enough to win. Is that ugly? As far as I'm concerned, that's not ugly. That's an efficient way of getting what you want.
So, Rodri, just shut it!
Image Source: https://images.app.goo.gl/y6ABXsHBW8Ab5giS6
You use whatever tactic will win the game and it is that simple. Not all styles are great to watch as it is the result that matters. Mourinho is often spoken about with parking the bus tactics and yet he is often successful so who are others to complain.
It's just so frustrating that everyone now sees the possession based football as the 'right' way to play. Watching a football match as a neutral, I prefer to see two teams running at each other and shooting the ball at every given opportunity than making 1 million passes that will put me to sleep. That's probably the reason why I watch more of Bundesliga because of the fast and furious, exciting approach.
Netherlands proved against Argentina that possession football isnt always the route to go. When they changed tactics to the old fashioned English Long Ball game and started hoofing it up the field to the big men they ended up levelling the score and taking the game to extra time. Then they reverted to type and went back to what wasnt working in normal time, and ended up losing in the penalty shootout. Having found the way to score they made the mistake of giving up on the tactic and paid the price.
I felt like slapping Van Gaal for that loss against Argentina. It's pure madness to do the same thing that wasn't working previously and expecting it to work. With Weghorst and Luuk de Jong I expected Netherlands to load the box at extra time. Surprisingly, they yielded the ball to Argentina and even wasted some time. I guess they believe the very tall Noppert will help them during the penalty shootout.
Congratulations @mckane! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 6000 upvotes.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPCheck out the last post from @hivebuzz:
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!
Rodri was just been jealous and didn't know the right words to express his pain. Football is a tactical game, it isn't about just running around the pitch trying to get a goal and that's why sometimes, the unexpected happens.
Tactics are what allowed the Netherlands to progress into the extra time yesterday. Tactics are part of the game and you can't expect Rodri to find it favorable especially when those tactics kicked them out of the worldcup
Seriously, I'm just fed up with the recent analogy that the team with more possession of the ball deserves to win.
Those Netherlands dude disappointed themselves. Argentina will never be able to contain crosses into the box to Weghorst and De Jong. They should've stuck to the tactic that worked.
That's true, they returned into the defense mode in the extra time and allowed the South America to boss them around for a while.
Van dijk was too confident with the penalty and he messed up big time.
That was a good write up, I admired Morocco and how they won against Spain and Portugal. Rank outsiders each time, but hard work, determination and counter attacking football did it for them. As you point out, quite similar to Leicester when they won the league.
I never gave them a chance to make it out of the group stage. They've continued to surprise. France will be very wary of them.
Gotta do whatever it takes to win. It's pretty bad how sore of a loser people and teams can be. Whatever happened to being humble I'm defeat?
It's very frustrating to see guys lose and then demean their opposition's tactics. If they were that good they should be able to win no matter the tactics employed by the opponent.
Spain didn't dominate Morocco. Morocco held their own and kept Spain outside the box. If you play possession style then of course the other team will defend.
Exactly!
But people somehow thinks a team that plays possession football is the team playing the right way. Some even called counterattack anti-football. So frustrating.