source
The very best players in their sport often have the unique ability to determine their futures. They can either decide to remain with their current teams or simply determine where to head next. More often than not, when a big name decides to move there is a variety of willing options ready to offer a lucrative contract. It is usually a battle with other teams to lure such a player who is spoiled for choice.

There are times however that such star players pose to be more of a burden than an asset to a would be team, forcing them to carefully weigh their options. It isn't every time a player is simply wanted because of the infinite amount of skill at his/her disposal. When it comes to securing the services of players, there are several factors to be considered that could explain why teams are hesitant.

Giving up Too Much

Take for instance the case of Kevin Durant wanting to leave the Brooklyn Nets. Arguably the best basketball player in the World, one would've thought he'd have secured a deal by now. While teams realize that Durant's addition will no doubt be a boost to their team, many try to weigh the consequences of bringing him into the fold, and what that would mean for the team.

Take for instance the case of Rudy Gobert being traded to the Minnesota Timberwolves. The deal saw the Utah Jazz get three solid NBA players and one rookie with a ton of potential, all while reducing the financial burden of having to keep Gobert in their salary cap. While Gobert was no doubt an influential part of the Jazz, his presence didn't bring them the NBA title. There is thus no evidence that a team without him would fare considerably worse. Considering the players they are getting for him, they may even fare better.

For team sports especially, it is worth noting that one individual does not make the team, even though that individual can be a central piece that does propel them to eventual success. We saw this with Cristiano Ronaldo and Manchester United in the English soccer premier league, as well as LeBron James and the Lakers in the NBA last year. Teams realize this and that is why they can be skeptical when it comes to signing available top talent.

Money

Many superstars also want to be paid a superstars worth even when they desire a new challenge by themselves. Many teams simply do not have the financial muscle and have resorted instead to developing cheaper, unheralded talents. In a place like the NBA with a salary cap signing an MVP calibre player will mean forgoing some other top talents so as not to incure the luxury tax burden.

European football on the other hand runs in the opposite direction as there are no salary caps so it is quite possible to have a superstar packed team. This May be good for some dream partnerships, but it is bad overall for competition.

Conclusion

Sometimes it is really difficult to justify the cost of landing a superstar athlete and clubs are simply not willing to pay the price. Who can blame them? Teams have managed to achieve greatness without the use of superstars,just ask Leicester City of the English soccer Premier League.